In today’s hiring landscape, background checks play a critical role in helping employers make informed decisions. They offer insight into a candidate’s history, verify credentials, and assess reliability overall. For job seekers, however, the process can feel intimidating, especially if past legal issues might surface.
This raises one of the most frequent questions: Will a warrant appear on a background check? The short answer is that it often can—but the outcome depends on several important factors.
Whether or not a warrant appears on a background check depends largely on the type of warrant issued, the systems used by the issuing jurisdiction, and the depth of the screening being conducted. Some jurisdictions make warrant information publicly available, which may then be included in reports compiled by background screening providers. Others may restrict access, limiting visibility. For both employers and job candidates, understanding these differences is key to navigating the screening process effectively.
To better understand how a warrant can appear on a background check, it’s important to first recognize the two most common types: arrest warrants and bench warrants. Each carries different legal implications.
An arrest warrant grants law enforcement the legal authority to arrest a person suspected of committing a crime. These warrants are based on probable cause, meaning there is sufficient evidence to believe the person is involved in a criminal act. Executed arrest warrants are the most likely type of warrant to appear on an employment background check.
A bench warrant is typically issued when someone fails to appear in court. Common triggers include missing a scheduled court appearance, ignoring a jury summons, or failing to pay fines or restitution. Since bench warrants are tied directly to court records, they can also surface during background checks.
When a background check reveals a warrant, it’s important for employers to handle the situation thoughtfully, fairly, and in compliance with applicable laws. While the background screening company provides the information, all hiring decisions remain the sole responsibility of the employer. Here are the key steps employers should consider:
Not all warrants carry the same weight or implications. Employers should take time to evaluate the type and severity of the warrant in relation to the specific responsibilities of the role. Employers may wish to develop consistent internal policies that reflect the relevance and impact of different types of warrants within the context of each job.
If a warrant appears in a background check, employers should communicate directly with the individual. This conversation allows the person to provide context or clarification and may reveal that the matter has already been resolved or is in the process of being addressed. Given that warrants can be issued for a wide range of reasons, it’s important to allow space for explanation.
Employers should evaluate whether the warrant is relevant to the essential duties of the position and whether it poses any potential risk to the company, its employees, clients, or operations. This assessment should be conducted carefully and consistently, with a focus on job-relatedness and business necessity.
When reviewing warrant information in a background check, employers must navigate a complex landscape of legal responsibilities to ensure transparency, fairness, and compliance. Failure to do so can result in legal liability, reputational damage, and potential claims of discrimination.
Compliance with federal, state, and local laws—particularly the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA)—alongside consistent internal policies, is essential for making informed, unbiased hiring decisions. Notably, the FCRA imposes specific limitations on the scope of reportable information. Additionally, for positions with an annual salary of less than $75,000, certain records cannot be reported after seven years. These salary-based restrictions are a critical compliance factor when evaluating background findings, including warrants, and must be considered as part of a legally sound hiring process.
These regulations often require employers to follow a structured process before making any employment-related decisions based on background findings.
Before initiating a background check, employers are legally required to provide candidates with a clear, standalone written disclosure that outlines their intent to conduct the screening. Written authorization from the candidate must also be obtained in advance.
If the background check reveals information—such as an outstanding warrant—that may impact the hiring decision, employers must first issue a Pre-Adverse Action Notice. This must include a copy of the background report and a summary of the candidate’s rights under the FCRA. This step ensures the individual has an opportunity to review the findings.
Candidates must be given a reasonable amount of time to respond to the notice and address any potential inaccuracies in the report. For example, a warrant that appears may have already been resolved or dismissed, and the candidate should be given a chance to provide clarification or documentation.
If, after the review period, the employer decides to proceed with an adverse decision, a Final Adverse Action Notice must be issued.
By following this structured approach, employers not only meet their legal obligations under the FCRA but also foster a transparent and respectful hiring process. Taking the time to ensure accuracy and fairness builds trust, reduces risk, and promotes responsible hiring practices.
Understanding how warrants may appear on background checks—and how to handle that information responsibly—is essential for any employer committed to fair hiring practices and legal compliance. While not all warrants will show up, those that do can carry different implications depending on their nature, public accessibility, and relevance to the job in question.
For employers, comprehensive and compliant background screening is one of the most effective ways to reduce hiring risks. By working with a professional screening provider, employers gain access to accurate, current information that supports informed hiring decisions.
When employers apply consistent policies and consider both the context and job relevance of any warrant-related findings, they’re better equipped to make fair and responsible choices. This approach protects the organization from legal and reputational risks while also creating a more equitable hiring experience for candidates.
At SRA Screening, we recognize the critical need for clarity, accuracy, and compliance in this area. Our mission is to equip you with the tools and insights you need to make informed and confident decisions. We ensure the process remains fair, transparent, and aligned with legal standards.
For a detailed background check for warrants, contact us today!
Warrants can be public records, but this depends on the jurisdiction in which they are located. In many cases, if a warrant is classified as public, it is accessible not only to law enforcement and court officials but also to the public. However, access may vary based on state laws and how the specific court handles the disclosure of records.
Yes, background checks, particularly those that include national databases, can reveal warrants issued in other states, even if the applicant no longer lives in that jurisdiction.
A warrant cannot simply be “cleared” or removed at will. It must be formally addressed. Ignoring a warrant may lead to further legal consequences, so prompt and appropriate legal action is essential.
Warrants remain on your record indefinitely until they are resolved. Warrants do not expire and will stay active until formally addressed by the court.
The answer is it depends on the jurisdiction in which the warrant is issued.
A bench warrant is typically issued when an individual fails to appear in court or does not comply with a court order. Whereas an arrest warrant is issued based on probable cause that a person committed a crime, it grants law enforcement the authority to make an arrest.
If a warrant was issued but the case was later dismissed, the warrant itself would no longer be active. Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), only active warrants can be included in background checks, and dismissed cases are not reportable. As a result, a dismissed case and the associated inactive warrant would not appear in a background report.
DISCLAIMER: This blog post is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Please consult a qualified professional before making any decisions.
The FCRA is enforced federally, but states may also implement it and have their own consumer reporting laws. You may have additional rights under state law. For more information, contact your state or local consumer protection agency or your state attorney general.
In today’s hiring landscape, background checks play a critical role in helping
When an employee in a safety-sensitive role violates drug or alcohol regulations,
Get updates, exclusive offers, and insights straight to your inbox.
